User ID: 1250479 - [link to www.whale.to]
United States
05/16/2012 06:52 AM
Italian Court Says MMR VACCINE CAUSES AUTISM!!!
[snip]
Autism cases: for the tribunal of Rimini, “it is the fault of the vaccine” – April 10, 2012
Autism. Rimini District Court: “The fault of the vaccine.” The ministry ordered to pay compensation.
Now, it seemed an old theory denigrated, the court instead of Rimini argued that a vaccine can make a child autistic.
This judgment No. 2010/148, part No. 2010/0474, journal.n ° 2012/886, gave the appeal lodged by parents against the Department of Health, who demanded the payment of compensation for irreversible complications caused by a vaccine.
The vaccine is MMR. According to parents, in fact, symptoms of autism in their son did appear after inoculation.
[/snip]
Godlike Production
Translation: Initiative Citoyenne
Posted on May 7, 2012 by ChildHealthSafety
This is an extract of a Google translation from the Initiative Citoyenne blog [France]:
Autism cases: for the tribunal of Rimini, “it is the fault of the vaccine” – April 10, 2012
Autism. Rimini District Court: “The fault of the vaccine.” The ministry ordered to pay compensation.
Now, it seemed an old theory denigrated, the court instead of Rimini argued that a vaccine can make a child autistic.
This judgment No. 2010/148, part No. 2010/0474, journal.n ° 2012/886, gave the appeal lodged by parents against the Department of Health, who demanded the payment of compensation for irreversible complications caused by a vaccine.
The vaccine is MMR. According to parents, in fact, symptoms of autism in their son did appear after inoculation.
And really the same day, as read in the judgment [CHS Ed: this is a .pdf file in Italian which you can click to download]. Return to the clinic in Riccione, March 26, 2004, the child began to show troubling symptoms (diarrhea and nervousness) and then between 2004 and 2005 occurred signs of severe psychological distress to physical recognition, 7 August 2007, the total and permanent disability to 100%.”
To read the full translated post [or to read the original untranslated] click here:
Autism cases: for the tribunal of Rimini, “it is the fault of the vaccine” – April 10, 2012
Cas d’autisme: pour le tribunal de Rimini, “c’est la faute du vaccin” – Avril 10, 2012
[CHS Ed: We would be willing to post a professional translation of the judgement if any of our readers know a translator willing to translate the original Italian Court judgement - contact us on chs@childhealthsafety.com].
______________
ED’s UPDATE in green text 10 May 12: See our initial summary translation here:
Italy – Court Holds MMR Vaccine Causes Autism II – Initial English Summary
We expect to have a professional medical translation of the Italian Court’s judgement shortly and will post that on a new post.
If you want automatic notification of when the translation is posted then plug your email address into the “Email Subscription” box at the top left of this blog. You can always cancel the subscription later using the WordPress subscription facility if you do not want to get any more email notifications of CHS articles.
Cas d'autisme: pour le tribunal de Rimini, "c'est la faute du vaccin" Autism cases: for the tribunal of Rimini, "it is the fault of the vaccine
Original:
Jeudi 26 avril 2012 4 26 / 04 / Avr / 2012 21:42 Thursday, April 26, 2012 4 26/04 / April / 2012 9:42 p.m.
10 avril 2012 /April 10, 2012
Autisme. Autism. Tribunal de Rimini : « La faute du vaccin ». Le ministĂšre condamnĂ© Ă payer une indemnitĂ©. Rimini District Court: "The fault of the vaccine." The ministry ordered to pay compensation.
DĂ©sormais, cela semblait ĂȘtre une vieille thĂ©orie dĂ©nigrĂ©e, au contraire le tribunal de Rimini a soutenu qu'un vaccin peut rendre un enfant autiste . Now, it seemed an old theory denigrated, the court instead of Rimini argued that a vaccine can make a child autistic.
Ce jugement n° 2010/148, rĂŽle n°2010/0474, journal.n°2012/886, a donnĂ© droit au recours introduit par des parents contre le ministĂšre de la SantĂ©, qui demandaient le paiement d'une indemnitĂ© pour complications irrĂ©versibles causĂ©es par un vaccin . This judgment No. 2010/148, part No. 2010/0474, journal.n ° 2012/886, gave the appeal lodged by parents against the Department of Health, who demanded the payment of compensation for irreversible complications caused by a vaccine.
Le vaccin en question est le ROR . The vaccine is MMR. Selon les parents, en fait, les symptĂŽmes de l'autisme de leur fils sont vraiment apparus Ă la suite de l'inoculation. According to parents, in fact, symptoms of autism in their son did appear after inoculation.
Et vraiment le jour mĂȘme, comme lu dans le jugement . And really the same day, as read in the judgment . Au retour du dispensaire de Riccione, le 26 mars 2004, l'enfant a commencĂ© Ă manifester des symptĂŽmes prĂ©occupants (diarrhĂ©e et nervositĂ©) puis entre 2004 et 2005 sont survenus des signes de grave dĂ©tresse psycho-physique jusqu'Ă la reconnaissance, le 7 aoĂ»t 2007, de l'invaliditĂ© totale et permanente Ă 100%. Return to the clinic in Riccione, March 26, 2004, the child began to show troubling symptoms (diarrhea and nervousness) and then between 2004 and 2005 occurred signs of severe psychological distress to physical recognition, 7 August 2007, the total and permanent disability to 100%.
Que cela fut rapportĂ© Ă la vaccination pratiquĂ©e, le spĂ©cialiste Niglio l'avait dĂ©jĂ affirmĂ© en juin 2008 et la confirmation est arrivĂ©e un an aprĂšs par le spĂ©cialiste Montanari. That it was told the vaccination, the specialist Niglio had already stated in June 2008 and the confirmation came a year later by the specialist Montanari. Le lien, selon le jugement est donc « Ă©tabli ». Jusqu'Ă condamner le ministĂšre de la SantĂ© Ă payer une indemnitĂ© . The link, in the judgment is "established." Up condemn the Ministry of Health to pay compensation.
Le jugement a provoquĂ© une « grande confusion » entre les experts du Conseil Scientifique du Calendrier Vaccinal pour la Vie, qui rassemble des personnalitĂ©s de hauts rangs de l'HygiĂšne et de la SantĂ© Publique, de la MĂ©decine GĂ©nĂ©rale, de la PĂ©diatrie rĂ©gionale-hospitaliĂšre et universitaire chapeautant la SociĂ©tĂ© Italienne de l'HygiĂšne, de la MĂ©decine PrĂ©ventive et de la SantĂ© Publique (SItI), la FĂ©dĂ©ration Italienne des MĂ©decins de MĂ©decine GĂ©nĂ©rale (Fimmg), la FĂ©dĂ©ration Italienne des MĂ©decins PĂ©diatres (Fimp) et la SociĂ©tĂ© Italienne de PĂ©diatrie (Sip). The judgment has caused "great confusion" between the experts of the Scientific Council of the immunization schedule for Life, which brings together people with high ranks of Hygiene and Public Health, General Practice, the Regional Pediatric Hospital- university umbrella and the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health (ITIS), the Italian Federation of General Practice Doctors (Fimmg), the Italian Federation of Paediatricians Doctors (FIMP) and the Italian Society of Pediatrics (Sip).
Le jugement, selon ces experts, doit ĂȘtre « Ă©videmment » basĂ© « sur ce qui a Ă©tĂ© publiĂ©, il ya 14 ans, dans la revue Lancet, et successivement retirĂ© pour l'Ă©vident The judgment, according to these experts, must be "of course" based "on what has been published 14 years ago, in the Lancet, and successively removed for obvious non-fondement de ce qui a Ă©tĂ© initialement proposĂ© par un groupe de chercheurs britanniques ». non-foundation of what was originally proposed by a group of British researchers. "
La célÚbre revue médicale Lancet a en fait officiellement retiré l'étude sur les possibilités de liens entre l'autisme et le vaccin ROR. The leading medical journal Lancet actually formally withdrew the study on possible links between autism and MMR. L'article, publié en 1998 et écrit par le médecin britannique Andrew Wakefield, a été cause d'une longue dispute scientifique durant quasiment 12 ans. The article, published in 1998 and written by British physician Andrew Wakefield, was due to a long dispute over scientific nearly 12 years. Wakefield soutenait que le vaccin fut la cause d'infections intestinales, à la fois liées au syndrome de Kanner. Wakefield claimed that the vaccine was the cause of intestinal infections, both associated with Kanner syndrome. Ses affirmations furent discréditées par le monde scientifique, et ont été la base des plus importants litiges de l'histoire de la médecine : His claims were discredited by the scientific world, and were the basis of the most important disputes in the history of medicine:
« Malheureusement – commente le Conseil Scientifique – les fausses thĂšses proposĂ©es ont "Unfortunately - says the Scientific Council - false theories have proposed conduit Ă une forte diminution des vaccinations aux Etats Unis, en Grande Bretagne et dans d'autres pays d'Europe, avec la consĂ©quence, dans de nombreux cas, d'une augmentation soudaine des cas de rougeole et ses complications, y compris plusieurs cas d'encĂ©phalite et de mort ». led to a sharp decline in vaccinations in the United States, Britain and other European countries, with the result, in many cases, a sudden increase in cases of measles and its complications, including several cases encephalitis and death. "
« Divers points des travaux en 1998 de Wakerfield sont incorrects », a dĂ©clarĂ© dans un communiquĂ© de presse la mĂȘme revue scientifique, traitant de la publication de 1998, rappellent les experts de la SItI, de la Fimmg, de la Fimp et de la Sip en une note, ajoutant que « une commission disciplinaire du ComitĂ© de mĂ©decine gĂ©nĂ©rale britannique (General Medical Council), aprĂšs une Ă©tude soignĂ©e, a dĂ©clarĂ© comment Wakerfield a prĂ©sentĂ© sa recherche d'une façon « irresponsable et malhonnĂȘte » et a « ignorĂ© avec insensibilitĂ© » la souffrance des enfants objets de l'Ă©tude. "Different points of work in 1998 Wakerfield are incorrect," said in a press release the same journal, dealing with the 1998 publication, say the experts ITIS, the Fimmg, the FIMP and Sip in a note, adding that "a disciplinary committee of the British Committee of General Practice (General Medical Council), after careful study, told how Wakerfield presented his research in a" dishonest and irresponsible "and" ignored with insensitivity "the suffering of children covered by the study. Dans le rapport du ComitĂ© Scientifique on peut lire, en outre, que Wakefield a ainsi « ruinĂ© la rĂ©putation » de la profession mĂ©dicale. In the Scientific Committee's report can be read also that Wakefield has "ruined the reputation" of the medical profession. Le mĂȘme Wakefield a Ă©tĂ© expulsĂ© du CollĂšge des MĂ©decins et ne peut plus pratiquer la mĂ©decine. Verdicts si nets et graves qui laissent peu de doutes ». The same Wakefield was expelled from the College of Physicians and can no longer practice medicine. Verdicts net and if serious leave little doubt . "
Le Conseil Scientifique rappelle au contraire que « les rĂ©sultats de deux Ă©tudes scientifiques rĂ©cemment publiĂ©s dans une des revues mĂ©dicales les plus crĂ©dibles au niveau mondial , le British Medical Journal The Scientific Council recalls the contrary that "the results of two scientific studies published recently in one of the most credible medical journals worldwide , the British Medical Journal (une le 5 janvier 2011 BMJ 2011 ; 342 : c5347 ; et l'autre publiĂ©e le 11 janvier 2011 BMJ 2011 ; 342 : c5258) ont dĂ©clarĂ©s le non-fondement de cette association et, entre autres, que les patients ont Ă©tĂ© recrutĂ©s parmi les militants anti-vaccination, et que l'Ă©tude a Ă©tĂ© commandĂ©e et financĂ©e dans un but prĂ©cis caractĂ©risĂ© par des prĂ©jugĂ©s idĂ©ologiques et des intĂ©rĂȘts Ă©conomiques ». (A January 5, 2011 BMJ 2011 342: c5347, and the other published January 11, 2011 BMJ 2011 342: c5258) have reported the failure of the association and foundation, among others, that patients were recruited from anti-vaccination activists, and that the study was commissioned and funded for a specific purpose characterized by ideological prejudices and economic interests. "
« Trop souvent et sans preuves scientifiquement Ă©tablies, la seule relation concomitante entre l'administration d'un vaccin et un effet indĂ©sirable ou une pathologie due Ă une cause inconnue est considĂ©rĂ©e comme suffisant en soi pour considĂ©rer que la cause vient de la vaccination », commente le Conseil, selon lequel « avant de prendre des mesures qui directement ou indirectement auront un sens nĂ©gatif sur toute la communautĂ© faisant prendre un risque de maladie aux enfants et aux adultes par reflexe nĂ©gatif Ă l'adhĂ©sion au programme national de prĂ©vention, qui est appelĂ© Ă juger – Commission ex lois 210/92 – assumant la plus grande rigueur scientifique et surtout la durabilitĂ© des affirmations, des jugements basĂ©s sur les acquis universellement reconnus ». "Too often unproven and scientifically established, the only relationship between the concomitant administration of a vaccine and an adverse event or disease due to unknown causes is considered sufficient in itself to consider that the cause comes from vaccination," Council commented, that "before taking actions that directly or indirectly have a negative meaning to the whole community by taking a risk of illness for children and adults with negative reflex to join the national prevention program, which is called upon to judge - former Commission laws 210/92 - assuming the greatest scientific rigor and above all sustainability claims, judgments based on the universally recognized achievements. "
« Est Ă©galement anormal – continue la note des experts SItI, Fimmg, Fimp et Sip – le fait que le jugement citĂ© puisse ignorer les raisons et les actions de la communautĂ© scientifique nationale et internationale qui, entre autres, a le droit/ le devoir de protĂ©ger tous les travaux dans le seul but d'exercer la profession avec les garanties mĂ©dico-lĂ©gales voulues. "Also unusual - the note continues ITIS experts, Fimmg, FIMP and Sip - the fact that the city can ignore the judgment and reasons for the actions of national and international scientific community which, inter alia, the right / duty to protect all work solely in order to practice with the guarantees necessary forensic. Pourtant, un tel jugement Ă peine Ă©mis risque d'avoir pour seul rĂ©sultat la perte de confiance en notre instrument de prĂ©vention fondamentale pour la santĂ© des enfants et de toute la population, avec pour consĂ©quence la rĂ©-Ă©mergence de maladies graves et encore mortelles, comme la rougeole, et faisant croire Ă©galement aux parents d'enfants affectĂ©s d'une maladie grave telle que l'autisme d'avoir trouvĂ© la raison de tant de souffrances. Yet such a judgment issued just might have the only result the loss of confidence in our fundamental instrument of prevention to the health of children and the entire population, with consequent re-emergence of serious illness and even death, like measles, and thinking also to parents of children afflicted with serious illness such as autism have found the reason for so much suffering. Et certainement ces parents ne mĂ©ritent pas d'autres mensonges sur l'Ă©tat de leur enfant ». And these parents certainly do not deserve more lies about the status of their child. "
Enfin, pour Ă©viter que ce jugement fasse jurisprudence nĂ©gative sur les dynamiques professionnelles , le Conseil espĂšre que le MinistĂšre de la SantĂ©, en tant que dĂ©fenseur dans le cas qui a conduit au jugement controversĂ© de premiĂšre instance, va interjeter appel auprĂšs de la Cour de Bologne. Finally, to prevent this negative judgment set a precedent on professional dynamics, the Council hopes that the Ministry of Health, as an advocate in the case which led to the controversial judgment of first instance, will appeal to the Court of Bologna. A cette fin, les membres du Conseil se rendent « disponibles Ă aider le bureau du Procureur GĂ©nĂ©ral Ă fournir conseils et littĂ©ratures scientifiques valables pour souligner en particulier l'incapacitĂ© de cette vaccination spĂ©cifique Ă crĂ©er des antĂ©cĂ©dents provocant l'autisme». To this end, Council members will make "available to assist the Attorney General's office to provide advice and valid scientific literature to highlight in particular the failure of this specific vaccination to create provocative history of autism."
Source: Quotidianosanita.it Source: Quotidianosanita.it