True Health Is True Wealth!!

Monday, March 15, 2010

Last Call... Defeat ObamaCare

THE LAST CALL!! NOW OBAMACARE WILL GO ONE WAY OR ANOTHER... KEYBOARDS READY?? PHONES AND FAXES ON... 1,2,3 EASY!

LET'S ROLL

Confirmed by Dick Morris:

"There are 23 of these conservative-leaning Democratic House members who voted for Pelosi's Obamacare back in November, which passed by just five votes, with 39 Democrats defecting to vote against the bill.

All 23 of these Congressman who did vote for the Pelosi bill are extremely vulnerable.

Opponents of Obamacare need to climb all over these 23 Congressmen with TV ads and advocacy campaigns in their districts to get them to change their vote this time, to vote "no" to the Senate bill when it comes before the House.

Voters need to say, "You voted for Obamacare the first time. But your district opposes it by 2 to 1. Now it is coming up for a vote again. Listen to your constituents and vote no. We don’t want Medicare cuts or premium increases or rationing of medical care. Don’t monkey with our health care. Vote no this time.”

Since the House healthcare bill passed by five votes, much has happened and the political landscape has changed dramatically.

The Massachusetts election of a Republican to Ted Kennedy's Senate seat has sent shock waves through Washington. Every one of these 23 Democrats knows they will face an angry backlash in their districts if they vote for the Senate bill and go along with Pelosi-Reid plan to ram through Obamacare.

I believe now is the time to act for opponents to act. The truth is that Obamacare is hanging by a thread.

Opponents, if they move now, can drive a stake through its heart.

Once these Congressmen hear from their aroused constituents, they won’t be able to back Obamacare.

As I mentioned, the Pelosi health bill passed the House by only 220-215. Nancy Pelosi knows she has no margin for error.

If only a handful of these 23 Congressman change their vote under public pressure, the Pelosi-Reid plan is stopped and Obamacare is dead."

You can read the whole report here.

Scroll down the page for all my easy as 1,2,3 fax instructions and let's drive the message home!

Faxing is fast,easy and private through this site: http://www.gotfreefax.com/

For just $10 you can get 100 single page faxes, which will more than cover the names below. Simply create an account and you’ll be ready to fill in the simple form. I personally use two email accounts. One that I keep private and pay for the faxes with, and the other one which I attach to the faxes.

Fill out the top of the form as illustrated here and you can either type your message or paste in your message. Next you simply enter your “account info” and hit send. NOTE! AFTER SENDING, DO NOT LEAVE THE PAGE! INSTEAD LEFT CLICK ON THE SITE LOGO IN THE UPPER LEFT CORNER…from there you will return to the fax as it appeared before sending. Now you can change the recipient’s name and fax number, enter your account info and send another fax….so easy even I can do it!!

So….keyboards ready? Let’s begin…..

Since Dick didn't list the 23 members, this is a list of 29 that voted. I'm sure within this list of mostly moderate/blue dogs the 23 are included.

Rep. Betty Sutton (202) 225-2266

Rep. Bart Stupak (202) 225 4744

Rep. Bruce Braley 202-225-6666

Rep. Baron Hill 202-226-6966

Rep. Zack Space (202) 225-3394

Rep. Mike Arcuri (202)225-1891

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (202) 225-0378

Rep. Leonard Boswell 202) 225-5608

Rep. Dennis Moore (202) 225-2807

Rep. Christoper Carney (202) 225-9594

Rep. Patrick Murphy (202) 225-9511

Rep. Lincoln Davis 202.226.5172

Rep. Melissa Bean 202-225-7830

Rep. John Salazar 202-226-9669

Rep. Earl Pomeroy (202) 226-0893

Rep. Charlie Wilson 202) 225-5907

Rep. Brad Ellsworth :(202) 225-3284

Rep. Jim Cooper202-226-1035

Rep. Joe Donnelly (202) 225-6798

Rep. Mike Michaud 202-225-2943

Rep. Mike Thompson (202) 225-4335

Rep. Adam Schiff (202) 225-5828

Rep. Jane Harman (202) 226 7290

Rep. Joe Baca (202)225-8671

Rep. Sanford Bishop (202) 225-2203

Rep. Henry Cuellar 202-225-1641

Rep. Loretta Sanchez (202) 225-5859

Rep. Jim Costa 202-225-9308

Rep. Marion Berry (202) 225-5602

"The ardor of public opposition will determine whether this battle is won or lost."

Lets's roll! Sue - Smart Girl Politics

Soylent Green Anyone???

Movie (full length): Soylent Green – They Were People

Holland Takes Euthanasia to the Extreme

Stupak: Dems Say Abortions Will Make Health Care Cheaper

In the ObamaCare Bill as outlined by Dr. Stephen E. Frasier, MD in a letter to Indiana Senator Bayh and published in the Indianapolis Star:

Page 30 Sec 123 of HC bill: THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benefits you get.

Page 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill: YOUR HEALTH CARE IS RATIONED!!!

Page 42 of HC Bill: The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC benefits for you. You have no choice!

Page 272 SEC. 1145: TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS - Cancer patients - welcome to rationing!

Page 425 Lines 4-12: The Gov’t mandates "Advance-Care Planning Consult." (Think senior citizens end-of-life patients.)

Page 425 Lines 17-19: The Govt will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney, etc. (And it's mandatory!) – Think Holland

Page 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3: The Govt provides an "approved" list of end-of-life resources; guiding you in death. (Also called 'assisted suicide.') (Sounds like Soylent Green to me.)

Page 427 Lines 15-24: The Gov’t mandates a program for orders on "end-of-life." (The Gov’t has a say in how your life ends!)

Page 429 Lines 1-9: An "advanced-care planning consultant" will be used frequently as a patient's health deteriorates.

Page 429 Lines 10-12: An "advanced care consultation" may include an ORDER for end-of-life plans.. (AN ORDER TO DIE FROM THE GOVERNMENT?!?)

Page 429 Lines 13-25: The GOVT will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.. (I wouldn't want to stand before God after getting paid for THAT job!)

Page 430 Lines 11-15: The Gov’t will decide what level of treatment you will have at end-of-life! (Again -- no choice!)

Is anybody ready to apologize to Joe Wilson and Sarah Palin yet?? You will be if this passes!!!

Stupak: Dems Say Abortions Will Make Health Care Cheaper And so it begins... Support of abortions to lower the cost of HC and cutting the population.

Stupak: Dems Say Abortions Will Make Health Care Cheaper

And so it begins... Support of abortions to lower the cost of HC and cutting the population. Holland promoting voluntary Euthanasia at age 70...

What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue — come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.”

If Obamacare passes, Stupak says, it could signal the end of any meaningful role for pro-life Democrats within their own party. “It would be very, very hard for someone who is a right-to-life Democrat to run for office,” he says. “I won’t leave the party. I’m more comfortable here and still believe in a role within it for the right-to-life cause, but this bill will make being a pro-life Democrat much more difficult. They don’t even want to debate this issue. We’ll probably have to wait until the Republicans take back the majority to fix this.”

“Throughout this debate, even when the House leaders have acknowledged us, it’s always been in a backhanded way,” he laments. “I’m telling the others to hold firm, and we’ll meet next week, but I’m disappointed in my colleagues who said they’d be with us and now they’re not. It’s almost like some right-to-life members don’t want to be bothered. They just want this over. Read The Full Article

To Abort or not to Abort… Legalized Abortion or No Legalized Abortion

This is the best one I have ever read. We need more Dr's like this.. Blessings

A worried woman went to her gynecologist and said: 'Doctor, I have a serious problem and desperately need your help! My baby is not even 1-yr-old and I'm pregnant again. I don't want kids so close together.'

So the doctor said: 'Ok, and what do you want me to do?' She said: 'I want you to end my pregnancy, and I'm counting on your help with this.' The doctor thought for a little, and after some silence he said to the lady: 'I think I have a better solution for your problem. It's less dangerous for you too.' She smiled, thinking that the doctor was going to accept her request. Then he continued: 'You see, in order for you not to have to take care of 2 babies at the same time, let's kill the one in your arms. This way, you could rest some before the other one is born. If we're going to kill one of them, it doesn't matter which one it is. There would be no risk for your body if you chose the one in your arms.

The lady was horrified and said: 'No doctor! How terrible! It's a crime to kill a child!

'I agree', the doctor replied. 'But you seemed to be ok with it, so I thought maybe that was the best solution. The doctor smiled, realizing that he had made his point. He convinced the mom that there is no difference in killing a child that's already been born and one that's still in the womb. The crime is the same!

Sometimes it just takes a different vantage point to put things in the right perspective. That is the same with abortion clinics, abortion legislation and abortion funding… especially taxpayer funding for abortions. One of the reasons the U.S. is in the situation it is, is because somewhere along the way… we lost our way. You can’t be a part-time Christian or a part-time Patriot. Something is either right, or it is wrong. Murder is either right or wrong. We have to choose to live by the Bible and the Constitution, or live in chaos. The present healthcare bill questions our commitment to both.

Together we can help save precious lives! That is unless we are no longer given the choice~

May God bless all doctors like this one!

ALSO:

AUDIO: Stupak: Waxman Told Me We Want to Pay for Abortions
Stupak Claims Committee Chairman Wants Government to Fund Abortions
More from Breibart.tv
Holland Takes Euthanasia to the Extreme
Video: Soylent Green - Remember that Movie?

White House backs down on health bill deals

Senate Keeping 'Kickbacks' in Health Care Bill

Kickbacks Stand: White House backs down on health bill deals

(AP) – 14 hours ago

WASHINGTON — The White House is backing down from trying to get senators to remove some special deals from the health care bill.

Senior adviser David Axelrod says the White House only objected to deals that affected just one state, such one involving Medicaid and Nebraska that's being cut from the legislation.

Axelrod says that deals that could apply to more than one state are OK.

That means deals pushed by senators from Montana and Connecticut would be fine because they're written in such a way that other states could potentially qualify.

It's a change from a couple days ago when press secretary Robert Gibbs singled out the Montana and Connecticut deals and said President Barack Obama wanted them gone.

Axelrod spoke on ABC's "This Week."

Source: Associated Press/Fox Nation

Facts About ObamaCare

ObamaCare Imposes $2.5 Trillion In New Taxes

ALERT: 25 percent of Americans earning under $200,000 a year would see their taxes rise under ObamaCare. An analysis by former CBO Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin reveals that Obama has lied again by pushing massive tax increases on every American, breaking his campaign promise not to raise taxes. The latest CBO report details Obama's 10 year tax scheme - Punish Americans with new taxes for the first four years with no healthcare benefits and cuts in Medicare to Seniors.

TELL ALL 261 Democrat/Independent Representatives, Blue Dog Democrats AND President Obama To KILL THIS BILL and CUT HealthCare COSTS FIRST.

Obama's bulldog Pelosi says: “JUST PASS THE BILL THEN YOU CAN READ WHAT'S IN IT!”

The Facts Pelosi Does NOT Want You To Know:

ObamaCare puts 7 percent of Americans on a government subsidy to help pay for mandatory health insurance.
ObamaCare raises taxes on 25 percent of those earning under $200,000 a year.
ObamaCare raises taxes on three middle-class families to pay for every family receiving a government subsidy.
ObamaCare excludes 93 percent of Americans who are NOT eligible for a tax benefit under the bill.
Tax and hurt seniors by taking $500 Billion from Medicare.

75% of Americans polled by CNN reject it. Pelosi says - JUST PASS THE BILL THEN YOU CAN READ WHAT'S IN IT!

THE "KENNEDY HEALTH CARE BILL" WAS WRITTEN INTO THE NEW HEALTH CARE REFORM INITIATIVE ENSURING THAT THAT CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT WILL BE 100% EXEMPT !

Buried in his massive amendment to the Senate version of Obamacare is Reid's anti-democratic poison pill designed to prevent any future Congress from repealing the central feature of this monstrous legislation!

Beginning on page 1,000 of the measure, Section 3403 reads in part: "It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection."

In other words, if President Barack Obama signs this measure into law, no future Senate or House will be able to change a single word of Section 3403, regardless whether future Americans or their representatives in Congress wish otherwise!! (This will be challenged in Court but the audacity and darkness behind this type of legislation speaks for itself.)

Note that the subsection at issue here concerns the regulatory power of the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB) to "reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending." without particulars of how and how not to reach this goal.

That is precisely the kind of open-ended grant of regulatory power that effectively establishes the IMAB as the ultimate arbiter of the cost, quality and quantity of health care to be made available to the American people. And Reid wants the decisions of this group of unelected federal bureaucrats to be untouchable for all time.

FACTS - If the Slaughter Method is used:

1. The Senate Bill will be passed as is… including all the kick backs.

2. Abortions will be covered using taxpayer money.

3. The chances of any of the questionable legislation or deals promised to be removed from this bill will not happen.

4. Additional deals are being cut one by one to get the votes on this bill and everyone will cost you money and or freedoms!

5. The takeover of the student loan industry, including federal control over curriculum and ‘service requirements’ for your children is being attached to this bill.

6. There will be no 72-house opportunity for the legislators or the people to read the bill.

7. The 2/3 of negative legislation already passed (see below) as part of the stimulus bill and others will be activated by this bill’s passing.

8. Experts say that the chances of this bill being over-turned, or at least a large part of it, is virtually nil once it passes.

And finally, here is a letter from Stephen E. Fraser, MD to Senator Evan Bayh outlinding the HC Bill… that he read. It was published in Indianapolis Star: If You Still Have Doubt About ObamaCare – Doctor’s Letter to Indiana Senator Bayh

Tag… you stand and fight now… or Tag… you and your children and grandchildren lose!!!

If you are against government taking over your healthcare… ending up in higher costs, worse services and loss of lots of freedoms… NOW is the time to stand up or stand up again…!!!

According to yesterday’s poll, Obama is at an all time low personally and definitely on Obamacare.

Senators from your State. or Congress.org - Elected Officials

1-202-224-3121- Congressional Switchboard

1-202-225-3121- Congressional Switchboard

(202) 225-0100 - Speaker of the House Pelosi

When There is More Sh_t Than Shinola… It Is Time To Grab a Shovel

John McCain Proposes Natural Supplement Regulation Bill

Doctors Challenging Government Health Care and the AMA

Obama Urges Dems: Pass My Health Bill to Save My Presidency – In reality it will destroy the democrat party along with the best healthcare system in the world

Last Chance to Pass Healthcare: Join the Fight!!

Dems to Slaughter Democracy Next Week Over ObamaCare

Indiana Doctor’s Letter to Senator Bayh

The following are the House members who voted no last year on Obamacare who are reportedly warming to the bill and might be in danger of switching their votes to yes: (an asterisk * denotes those who have moved even more decisively for the bill):

Adler, NJ
Altmire, Pa*
Baird, Wash*
Boucher, Va.
Gordon, Tenn* (is retiring, so more immune to pressure)
Kosmas, Fla
Kratovil, Md
Kucinich, Ohio
Markey, Col
McMahon, NY
Murphy, NY
Nye, Va
Tanner, Tenn (is retiring, so more immune to pressure)
In addition, Eric Massa of New York, who voted no, has resigned from the House losing an additional vote against the bill.

But their possible defections are more than countered by the following members who voted yes last year who are reportedly moving closer to a vote against the bill. Again, an asterisk means a more decisive move against it:

Arcuri* NY
Dahlkemper* Pa
Connolly* Va
Ellsworth* Ind
Berry*, Ark (retiring)
Cuellar* Texas
Gifford* Ariz
McInerney* Cal
Pomeroy* ND
Carney, Pa
Kanjorski, Pa
Kirkpatrick, Ariz
Mollohan, WV
Rahill, WV
Space, Ohio
Titus, Nevada

In addition, Congressman John Murtha, who voted yes, has died and Louisiana Republican Joseph Cao, who cast the lone GOP vote for the bill now indicates he will vote against it. Congressman Wexler of Florida has resigned and a replacement is not to be chosen until next month, costing the bill another vote.

So, 19 members have moved closer to voting no while 14 have moved closer to voting yes.

Of the nineteen who have moved closer to voting no, ten are the subject of League of American Voters ads: Arcuri, Dahlkemper, Gifford, Pomeroy, Carney, Kanjorski, Kirkpatrick, Mollohan, Rahill, and Space.

But we have an urgent need to advertise in the eleven districts where members who voted no are moving toward a yes vote. Please send us funds right now so we can put ads in their districts on Monday. (The vote will probably come at the end of next week unless they don’t have the votes to pass it).

By the whip count, you can see how close the vote is. We need to keep redoubling our efforts!

PLEASE CALL!

DC OFFICE
LOCAL OFFICE

Harry Mitchell
(202) 225-2190
(480) 946-2411

Gabrielle Giffords
(202) 225-2542
(520) 881-3588

Ann Kirkpatrick
(202) 225-2315
(928) 226-6914

Jerry McNerney
(202) 225-1947
925-833-0643

John Salazar
202-225-4761
970-245-7107

Jim Himes
(202) 225-5541
(866) 453-0028

Alan Grayson
(202) 225-2176
(407) 841-1757

Bill Foster
(202) 225-2976
630-406-1145

Baron Hill
202 225 5315
812 288 3999

Mark Schauer
(202) 225-6276
(517) 780-9075

Gary Peters
(202) 225-5802
(248) 273-4227

Dina Titus
(202) 225-3252
702-256-DINA (3462)

Carol Shea-Porter
(202) 225-5456
(603) 743-4813

Tim Bishop
(202) 225-3826
(631) 696-6500

John Hall
(202) 225-5441
(845) 225-3641 x49371

Bill Owens
(202) 225-4611
(315) 782-3150

Mike Arcuri
(202)225-3665
(315)793-8146

Dan Maffei
(202) 225-3701
(315) 423-5657

Earl Pomneroy
(202) 225-2611
(701) 224-0355

Steven Driehaus
(202) 225-2216
(513) 684-2723

Mary Jo Kilroy
(202) 225-2015
(614) 294-2196

Zach Space
(202) 225-6265
(330) 364-4300

Kathy Dahlkemper
(202) 225-5406
(814) 456-2038

Patrick Murphy
(202) 225-4276
(215) 826-1963

Christopher Carney
(202) 225-3731
(570) 585-9988

Paul Kanjorski
(202) 225-6511
(570) 825-2200

John Spratt
(202) 225-5501
(803)327-1114

Tom Perriello
(202) 225-4711
(276) 656-2291

Alan Mollohan
(202) 225-4172
(304) 623-4422

Nick Rahall
(202) 225-3452
(304) 252-5000

Steve Kagen
(202) 225-5665
(920) 437-1954

Sample letter for Monday to Copy, paste, fax and call...

ALL CONGRESS AND SENATE

ObamaCare needs to be taken off the table. All versions. Now! No talks. No televised discussions. Nothing... until Congress and the White House agree to START OVER! OR ELSE PLEASE VOTE “NO” ON THIS TRAIN WRECK OF A HEALTH CARE BILL.

I am disgusted by the deceptive tactics employed in recent days - simultaneously planning televised "bi-partisan" discussions while holding back-room meetings on how to ram ObamaCare through with no bi-partisan support. Such underhanded efforts are offensive to me and millions of Americans.

Also, as a pro-life American, I adamantly oppose any healthcare plan that will require me to pay for abortions with my tax dollars. Any government sponsored healthcare system with this mandate is bad for America and violates the deeply held beliefs of many Americans.

Its past time to scrap all the versions of ObamaCare and start over with a constitutionally correct and moral plan with far less government intrusion. I urge you to stand with a clear majority of Americans and oppose ObamaCare or any other plan containing an abortion mandate and "public
option." I will be monitoring your vote on this bill.

I doubt whether they will bother making any changes or adding things afterwards. They just want it to pass, so Obama can implement his socialistic agenda and we as Americans do not want anything to do with a socialistic government.

Men and women have died for our Freedoms and our Republic. We will fight for our country. Obama and his administration needs to be “Recalled “or “Impeached”. We are not happy with his style of government period.

GOD BLESS AMERICA (Hat Tip to Woodey at AAM)

Phone numbers are above

Fax numbers and other information can be found at: Senators from your State. or Congress.org - Elected Officials or faxes can be sent in bulk through: Select Here SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

If you can get to a rally at any of the Congress-peoples’ or Senators’ local offices or in DC, please do…. and keep praying for the defeat of ObamaCare.

And go to Dick Morris.com and donate if you can to keep running the Anti-ObamaCare Ads in critical areas.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Holland Takes Euthanasia to the Extreme

Holland proposes giving over-70s the right to die if they 'consider their lives complete'

By MAIL FOREIGN SERVICE
Last updated at 11:23 AM on 10th March 2010

Senior Woman Sitting in Wheelchair

World first: Holland will consider assisted suicide for over 70s

Assisted suicide for anyone over 70 who has simply had enough of life is being considered in Holland.

Non-doctors would be trained to administer a lethal potion to elderly people who 'consider their lives complete'.

The radical move would be a world first and push the boundaries even further in the country that first legalised euthanasia.

The Dutch parliament is to debate the measure after campaigners for assisted suicide collected 112,500 signatures in a month.

Euthanasia has been available for the terminally ill in Holland since 2002 in cases of 'hopeless and unbearable suffering' certified by two doctors, but this would be a far bigger step.

Supporters say it would offer a dignified way to die for those over 70 who just want to give up living, without having to resort to difficult or unreliable solitary suicide methods.

They might include widows and widowers overwhelmed by grief, those unwilling to face the frailties of extreme old age or people determined to ‘get out while they’re ahead’ and meet death on their own terms.

The assistants who administered the deadly cocktail of sedatives would need to be certified, campaigners said.

More...

A licence to kill? Assisted suicide case relatives won't be charged if they act out of compassion

And they would have to make sure that patients were not acting on a whim or due to a temporary depression, but from a heartfelt and enduring desire to die.

But critics say there is scope for the elderly to come under untoward pressure from unscrupulous relatives.

Many religious groups oppose any form of suicide on principle.

And the Royal Dutch Medical Association - which played a key role in supporting the nation's euthanasia law - fears patients would use the policy as a way of getting around their own doctors.

Although Switzerland allows assisted suicide in cases where someone is not terminally ill, the Dutch measure would go further.

Renowned British conductor Sir Edward Downes and his wife Joan died together in the assisted suicide clinic Dignitas in Zurich

'Own choosing': Renowned British conductor Sir Edward Downes and his wife Joan died together in the assisted suicide clinic Dignitas in Zurich

In July 2009, British conductor Sir Edward Downes, 85, and his wife Joan, 74, died together at the Dignitas suicide clinic outside Zürich 'under circumstances of their own choosing,' in the words of a family statement.

Sir Edward was not terminally ill, but virtually blind and deaf, while his wife was diagnosed with rapidly developing cancer.

In 2008 former rugby player Daniel James, 23, died at Dignitas. He had been paralysed from the waist down when his spine was dislocated in a training accident.

But Swiss law required Sir Edward and Mr James to hold and drink a lethal draught themselves, while in Holland the dose could be administered by a non-medical assistant.

Marie-Jose Grotenhuis of the Dutch 'Of Free Will' campaign said: 'We've been overwhelmed by the amount of reactions, especially because people took it so seriously and reactions were mostly positive.'

Several European countries allow some assistance to terminally ill people who wish to die. Belgium has followed the Dutch euthanasia model, while Britain and France allow terminally ill people to refuse treatment but stop short of allowing active euthanasia.

Around 2,500 euthanasia cases were reported in the Netherlands in 2009, rising gradually in the past decade as doctors have become more willing to disclose the practice.

Campaigners for the over-70s assisted suicide measure needed 40,000 signatures to force a debate in parliament and will do so after national elections on June 9.

The plan is certain to face resistance and if approved would still need to go through a lengthy process before becoming law.

The legalisation of euthanasia for the terminally ill was preceded by decades of discussion and quiet negotiation that attached stringent conditions and medical supervision.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1256670/Holland-proposes-giving-70s-consider-lives-complete-right-die.html#ixzz0hu6lCgjM

This should be an eye opener for all those pro-ObamaCare people who haven't read the bill or can't read between the lines... Is there really anybody out there that thinks this is okay?? Or that 70 is that old?? Or that healthy people are every useless??

This is what we should be celebrating and shooting for:

2 of oldest people in US die: in NH 114, Mich. 113

Mon Mar 8, 9:34 pm ET

WESTMORELAND, N.H. – Two of the oldest people in the world have died on the same day.

Mary Josephine Ray, who was certified as the oldest person living in the United States, died Sunday at age 114 years, 294 days. She died at a nursing home in Westmoreland but was active until about two weeks before her death, her granddaughter Katherine Ray said.

"She just enjoyed life. She never thought of dying at all," Katherine Ray said. "She was planning for her birthday party."

Ray died just hours before Daisey Bailey, who was 113 years, 342 days, said L. Stephen Coles, a director of the Gerontology Research Group, which tracks and studies old people and certifies those 110 or older, called supercentenarians.

"It's very rare that two of our supercentenarians die on the same day," Coles said.

Bailey, who was born March 30, 1896, died in Detroit, he said. She had suffered from dementia, said her family, which claimed she was born in 1895.

Ray, even with her recent decline, managed an interview with a reporter last week, her granddaughter said.

Ray was the oldest person in the United States and the second-oldest in the world, the Gerontology Research Group said. She also was recorded as the oldest person ever to live in New Hampshire.

The oldest living American is now Neva Morris, of Ames, Iowa, at age 114 years, 216 days. The oldest person in the world is Japan's Kama Chinen at age 114 years, 301 days.

Ray was born May 17, 1895, in Bloomfield, Prince Edward Island, Canada. She moved to the United States at age 3.

She lived for 60 years in Anson, Maine. She lived in Florida, Massachusetts and elsewhere in New Hampshire before she moved to Westmoreland in 2002 to be near her children.

Ray's husband, Walter Ray, died in 1967. Survivors include two sons, eight grandchildren, 13 great-grandchildren and five great-great-grandchildren.

Morris, the Iowa woman now believed to be the oldest U.S. resident, lives at a care center. Only one of her four children, a son in Sioux City, is still alive.

"She has some hearing deficiencies and a visual deficiency, but mentally she is quite alert and will respond when she feels like it and isn't too tired," said her 90-year-old son-in-law, Tom Wickersham, who lives in the same care center.

Wickersham said he visits his mother-in-law — who plays bingo and enjoys singing "You Are My Sunshine" — nearly every day.

2/3 of the HC Bill Passed Already! Hidden in the Stimulus Package that No One in Congress Read…

12 Surprising Signs That You Will Live To Be 100
Go Granny Go

Saturday, March 6, 2010

ObamaCare Issues and Options

You knew some religious sects are exempt from the current healthcare bill, right? What's your exemption?

Onward, He Said, Regardless – Charles Krauthammer

Congress Exempts Amish From Health Care Bill

Published 1, January 18, 2010
There is an interesting controversy brewing over the current version of the health care bill in which Amish families are exempted from the mandatory coverage. Other groups may also receive exemptions.
For some Americans who do not want to pay for health insurance (but face a fine under the law), the exemptions are likely to trigger challenges. Why should an Amish person be allowed exemption, but not someone with political or philosophical opposition to the insurance?

The Amish do use medical facilities and regular doctors, but they pay in cash. They believe that such care is the primary responsibility of their church.

The question is why religious conscientious objectors are given exemptions but not secular conscientious objectors. There are plenty of people who have profound objections to this plan that are not religious based. Is it far to allow only faith-based objectors to get exemptions so that some Christians can apply but not Cato members?
Congress can probably prevail in such distinctions (much like conscientious objectors to the draft), but it raises in my view a legitimate question of fairness.

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/01/18/congress-exempt-amish-from-hea...

The Healthcare Bill and Its Troubling "Religious Conscience" Exemption

By MARCI A. HAMILTON
Thursday, August 6, 2009

When it comes to H.R. 3200 -- the over-1000-page-long bill to overhaul the American health care system -- there is no question that the devil is in the details. While Americans are trying to absorb the positions taken by each party regarding the big picture issues, such as how "universal" is "universal," and whether it is appropriate to limit care for the elderly, they are being told very little about the interest group deals that have been included in the bill.

The one that most troubles me, setting aside the financial and tax ramifications of the whole structure, is the exemption for "religious conscience" at Part VII, Subpart A, Sec. 59B(c)(5) (on pages 170-171 of the House Draft). Including such an exemption in the bill is both unconstitutional and dangerous for children in faith-healing homes.
A Special Exemption that Unconstitutionally Favors Only Established Religions Such as Christian Science.

The Subpart begins with a requirement that a tax be imposed on any individual who does not satisfy the requirements of the bill to obtain medical coverage. The exemption states, however, that this tax "shall not apply to any individual (and any child residing with such individual) for any period if such individual has in effect an exemption which certifies that such individual is a member of a recognized religious sect or division . . . and an adherent of established tenets or teachings of such sect or division. . . ."

First, it is not consistent with the First Amendment to grant exemptions solely to "a recognized religious sect" with "established tenets or teachings." If the government can tolerate a religious exemption, then it must do so evenhandedly among religious believers with the same beliefs. This is sheer favoritism for a certain class of religions, or even for one religion.

Although the language is somewhat opaque, there is little question that the Christian Science Church's lobbyists are responsible for this provision. As Malcolm Maclachlan reported in The Capitol Weekly, according to one of the Church's lobbyists, the Church is lobbying across the country to ensure that medical care exemptions based on religion are included in health care reform bills. They succeeded in introducing the similar exemptions in parallel California bills, which ultimately did not pass.

In a previous column, I pointed out how the Church had obtained funds under the Medicare program to cover the costs of faith healers and hospice-like centers where no medical care was provided. Yes, Medicare funds are now being used to cover faith-healing in circumstances where medical care is being rejected. The first version of that law clearly identified Christian Scientists as the recipients of that federal funding. When that aspect of the law became publicly known, however, Congress amended the law to make it more opaque, even though its wording was tailor-made for Christian Scientists. The few constitutional challenges to the Medicare system's payment of religious practice have been rejected in the lower appellate courts, despite the obvious impropriety of Congress' favoritism shown toward a single church and belief system and of funding non-medical care with funds dedicated to medical care.

The Provision Puts Children In Serious Peril – Including Peril of Death
A second important problem with the exemption – and one that is of grave importance – is that it puts children in danger. Health care reform is an opportunity for the United States to turn back the tide on the ability of religious parents to let their children perish or become disabled. The common law rule is that a parent is required to provide a child with adequate medical care, and that rule should be followed. It is beyond disappointing that in 2009, in a federal bill, this basic need of children has been traded away to lobbyists.
Yet the federal government is not alone in ignoring the common law rule. In a significant minority of states, there are faith-healing exemptions from the state's medical neglect laws. In these states, if a child does not receive medical treatment because a parent is a drug addict, then that parent is liable, usually both criminally and civilly. But in a home where the reason for the failure to treat is religious belief, states give the parents a pass on either civil or criminal liability, or on both. These exemptions were secured by the Christian Science Church, and they are the best argument against religious exemptions that exists, for the stakes could not be higher, nor the consequence of the exemption more baleful.

Some readers might discount the likelihood that a faith-healing parent will really watch his or her child die an agonizing death without obtaining help. But it does happen. Consider the recent Neumann jury verdict in Wisconsin, where the parents prayed over their 11-year-old daughter, Madeline, but offered no medical treatment for her diabetes. The result: Madeline died of a completely treatable condition. Were her parents outliers? Not at all: They were accompanied in prayer by fellow believers. No one called 911 until Madeline stopped breathing. Ultimately, a criminal jury found her father guilty, but a guilty verdict cannot bring back a young life.
While adults can legally choose to forego medical treatment and, in effect, choose death, parents may not legally choose death for their children (ergo, the medical neglect laws). The provision of the federal health care bill I have described above, however, implies that it is appropriate that a child receive no medical care at all, so long as the child lives with a parent who believes in faith over medical treatment. That rule goes directly against the common law duty owed by parents to their children, to provide adequate treatment.

Such an exemption also means that the state will have to pay for the treatment of these children. In essence, if the bill is passed with the exemption intact, faith-healing parents would be able to avoid the tax imposed on every other underinsured adult, and then, when their children need medical attention, will still be able to expect the state to pay for their care. The federal government, after all, is exempting them from obtaining the health insurance that presumably will cover everyone else. The defense that they should not have to pay general taxes that contradict their religious beliefs was rejected in 1982, in United States v. Lee, when the Supreme Court held that the Amish must pay Social Security taxes for their employees just as every other employer does, despite their religious objections.

Amid The Controversy Over the Healthcare Bill, We Cannot Forget Children's Lives Are Put in Peril By the Exemption.

The sad truth is that members of Congress either do not know this religious-exemption provision exists within the mammoth health care bill, or else they are willing to pander to a small religious group at the expense of children's well-being.

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hamilton/20090806.html

Either way, this grave and important issue is a very good reminder that no one should ever assume that a piece of legislation actually serves the ends at which it is purportedly aimed. It is irrational to believe that permitting faith-healing parents to forego otherwise mandatory medical insurance will contribute to better health in the United States.

Critical Condition

The Reconciliation Diversion [Jeffrey H. Anderson] - March 04, 2010

Whether intentionally or not, the Obama administration has succeeded in distracting many Americans from the main line of attack. At this point, "reconciliation" is but a diversion. The House is the place under assault. And any and all available weaponry, including federal judgeships for one's family, is being brought to bear in the attack.

And this is true… Reconciliation is only a tool for amendments.

Click link for more information: http://healthcare.nationalreview.com/

Savage": Using Exemptions to Win

Please pass this along to all you know. I was listening to Michael Savage tonight. He stated that this health care bill will exempt Christian Scientist and Amish from being subject to health care due to religious freedom. He was talking about how we should all file lawsuits against the government for religious reasons. Quoting from http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=10406

"SO HERE’S MY SUGGESTION: IF THEY CAN MAKE EXCEPTIONS FOR THESE RELIGIOUS GROUPS, LET’S FIND OTHER RELIGIOUS GROUPS THAT THEY’LL HAVE TO FIND EXCEPTIONS FOR UNTIL THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE EXEMPTED FROM THE SYSTEM, THAT THEY WON’T POSSIBLY BE ABLE TO PAY FOR IT. LET’S THINK ABOUT THE POSSIBILITIES:"

Savage's take is to find some obstacle as it relates to different religious backgrounds that could possible exempt us from this Obamacare. I could not listen to the whole show as I was home and at 9 pm tonight i needed to make dinner, but he was going to take calls as to how we could exempt ourselves based on religious basis. So let's all put our thinking caps, think outside the box and protest and refuse based on religious beliefs. As a network, we can group together by religious types and file class action suits. I say it is worth a shot.

At this point ObamaCare is still short of votes. If they do manage to pass it, the Supreme Court reviews based on unconstitutionality will not be far behind. But that is a very long process and much of the pre-program billing of the taxpayers and hiring of more unnecessary gov’t workers for this program will have started and be costly and then difficult to reverse. In 2012, once Obama is out of office, much of the ObamaCare bill and the 2/3 of related legislation that has already been passed can be over-turned. But in the meantime, we need to do our homework and find and fight all the negative legislation.

But in the meantime, Michael Savage’s exemption program is worth a shot!~

Please keep fighting… contact your own representative and Senators plus the Blue Dogs, fence-sitters, and those that are still wavering. At this moment, nobody believes Pelosi has the votes, no matter what method they use.

75% of the American People do not want this bill…. ObamaCare of any type, yet he is plodding on.

Senators from your State. or Congress.org - Elected Officials

1-202-224-3121- Congressional Switchboard

1-202-225-3121- Congressional Switchboard

(202) 225-0100 - Speaker of the House Pelosi

When There is More Sh_t Than Shinola… It Is Time To Grab a Shovel

John McCain Proposes Natural Supplement Regulation Bill

Doctors Challenging Government Health Care and the AMA

Obama Urges Dems: Pass My Health Bill to Save My Presidency

Read The Full Article and Please Sign Petition

STERILIZATION OF OUR CHILDREN HAS BEGUN WITH THE H1N1 VACCINE...

Folks, if any of you have seen Bill Gates Video or read the article where he states he "loves vaccinations" which would help to depopulate the world in order to bring down the CO2 level to 0, then please look at the information below. (The video is below this blog) My daughter researched this after I sent her the video. She had her 3 year old vaccinated with the H1N1 vaccine because she had an infant at home and was frightened... Now she's even more frightened.... WE THE PEOPLE HAVE GOT TO TAKE CONTROL....

The following is from my daughter...

I did some research and viewing this and if anyone has kids... DEF think twice about vaccinations. This ingredient found in some vaccinations (including H1N1) causes sterility!! Very scary!!! I'm not one to send this info out because everyone has their own beliefs.... but this one scared me. (especially since I got Chris vaccinated with the H1N1) I've attached the link that others can read the whole info where I got this.

Polysorbate 80

Polysorbate 80 is similar to Sodium Deoxycholate in its ability to increase cell permeability, damage, and bursting. After injection it can rapidly metabolize into sorbitol and ethylene oxide which is much more toxic than the original chemical. When Polysorbate 80 breaks down there are 20 moles of ethylene oxide for every mole of sorbitol. These polysorbates have been shown to cause dangerous, sometimes fatal effects, when given through a needle. Changes in heart function can occur immediately. The blood-brain-barrier (BBB) can be weakened and penetrated, followed by seizures and even death. Polysorbates demonstrate synergistic toxicity with a wide range of chemicals.

Polysorbate 80 has been found to negatively affect the immune system and cause severe anaphylactic shock which can kill. According to Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Volume 95, Number 6, December 2005 , pp. 593-599(7), "it is of current relevance as a 'hidden' inductor of anaphylactoid reactions", and "Polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent for the anaphylactoid reaction of nonimmunologic origin in the patient. The study included a pregnant woman who suffered anaphylactic shock after being given a IV drip of multi-vitamins containing polysorbate 80.

In addition to this, there have been studies in Food and Chemical Toxicology which showed that Polysorbate 80 causes infertility. Baby female rats were injected with polysorbate 80 at days 4-7 after birth. It accelerated the maturing of the rats and caused changes to the vagina and womb lining, hormonal changes, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles.

According to the World Intellectual Property Organization, which is part of the United Nations, scientists from the organization are developing vaccines specifically to damage fertility as a method of contraception. A suggested ingredient for the vaccine is Polysorbate 80 (also known as tween 80). As it is a preferred ingredient, scientists are obviously aware of its ability to cause infertility.

The Goal of Every H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine: Immunotoxicity, Neurotoxicity and Sterility

Science dictates that only a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study can generate unbiased results in any clinical trial. In the history of vaccine development, no such study has ever been performed. It is only unscientific opinions and pharmaceutical propaganda which have propelled the mythological validity, safety and effectiveness of vaccines. Dozens of controlled studies have scientifically verified the immunotoxicty, neurotoxicity and sterility of common vaccine ingredients which destroy human health, yet they are all ignored by conventional medicine.

There should be a public outcry and challenge to every public health official, medical specialist or scientist (from any country) who justifies the inoculation of their population without providing the evidence of safety and effectiveness of the respective H1N1 vaccine in their country.

The public should be demanding that their governments materialize at least one vaccine trial which is randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled that can scientifically validate the assertions of public health officials.

Since the pharmacokinetic properties of vaccines are not studied, vaccine manufacturers cannot deny any of the toxic effects listed below. The reason they never analyze the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of these ingredients is because it would eradicate the vaccine industry. However the individual effects of each ingredient and their toxic effects on cells are well documented.
Every Physician, Nurse or medical personnel who administers the H1N1 vaccine (or any vaccine) should be asking themselves why they are injecting the following ingredients into patients that have been scientifically proven to cause immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, sterility and cancer:

Novartis Focetria Adjuvanted H1N1
Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Potassium Chloride: Neurotoxin
Squalene: Neurotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

Novartis H1N1 Monovalent Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Beta-Propiolactone: Carcinogen
Polymyxin: Neurotoxin
Neomycin: Immunotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

GlaxoSmithKline Arepanrix Adjuvanted
H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Formaldehyde : Carcinogen
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Sodium Deoxycholate: Immunotoxin
Squalene: Neurotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

GlaxoSmithKline Pandemrix Adjuvanted
H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Octoxynol 10: Immunotoxin
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Potassium Chloride: Neurotoxin
Sodium Deoxycholate: Immunotoxin
Squalene: Neurotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

GlaxoSmithKline Fluarix 2009-2010
Formula Ingredients/Toxicity
Formaldehyde : Carcinogen
Octoxynol 10: Immunotoxin
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Sodium Deoxycholate: Immunotoxin

Sanofi-Pasteur H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Formaldehyde : Carcinogen
Polyethylene Glycol: Systemic Toxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

MedImmune H1N1 Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Monosodium Glutamate: Neurotoxin
Gentamicin Sulfate: Nephrotoxic
Monobasic Potassium Phosphate: Immunotoxin

FLUARIX 2009 Latest Package Insert Ingredients/Toxicity
Formaldehyde : Carcinogen
Gentamicin Sulfate: Nephrotoxic
Polysorbate 80: Sterilie Agent
Sodium Deoxycholate: Immunotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

CSL PANVAX H1N1 Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Beta-Propiolactone: Carcinogen
Neomycin: Immunotoxin
Sodium Taurodeoxycholate: Carcinogen/Immunotoxin
Polymyxin: Neurotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

CSL Afluria H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Ingredients/Toxicity
Beta-Propiolactone: Carcinogen
Neomycin Sulfate: Immunotoxin
Polymyxin B: Neurotoxin
Potassium Chloride: Neurotoxin
Sodium Taurodeoxycholate: Carcinogen/Immunotoxin
Thimerosal: Neurotoxin

Note: An additional CSL H1N1 Vaccine is Undergoing Trials with AS03 Adjuvant which contains Squalene.

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/103009_vaccine_sterility_immunoto...

POWER INDEEDS CORRUPTS... PEOPLE, WE CANNOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN.

Bill Gates Video below: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WQtRI7A064&NR=1

Hat tip to Marianne of AAM

Comments:

There are NOT too many of us on the earth. Its where we choose to live that’s the problem, look at the earth with a population chart or whatever, we live in the masses in select areas by CHOICE, why? because its nicer there mainly, but we can make it nice other places too. Or look at Canada (where Im from) We are bigger than the united states, but have a lower population and the vast majority of our citizens live close to the border because they choose to, we need to spread out across the globe.

There are many options… and killing people whether it is at birth with abortions or with death panels by Big Brother withholding healthcare services to the elderly or undesirable or sterilizing people unknowingly or against their will(s) are all not part of them!

Here is one option… “Zeitgeist II – Adendum” and although I don’t agree with all of it, it is an option and certainly better than those of some of Obama’s czars, Bill Gates, the WHO and the United Nations. (All five parts are worth watching… part 5 has a solution theory:

Drug Companies Shift Emphasis to Vaccines

Hawaii passes Resolution Against Forced Vaccination

Athlete Crippled by Flu Shot

Swine Flu Alert - Shocking Vaccine Miscarriage Horror Stories

Obama Administration Launches Deceptive Swine Flue Propaganda Blitz

H1N1 Vaccine – Watch and Decided for Yourself

Journalist Files Charges Against WHO and UN for Bioterrorism and Intent to Commit Mass Murder

Obama Administration Launches Deceptive Swine Flu Propaganda Blitz
McCain Proposes Natural Supplement Regulation Bill

Avandia Recall… Finally After Senate Report

Looming Before Us: Corporate Threats to Your Food Supply

Merck Vaccine Dangers

Denver Schools Used for Vaccine Experiment