Interesting and by my research (I am not an expert) seems to be true. Cancer is something we all worry about, with reasons, and this should be taken into consideration.
Stop helping the pharmacological business at your own expense. As is being proved, the majority only care about their money making.
I have posted a great many emails on this one topic - Perhaps reading it as written by someone with *credentials* will reach thru to some folks.
Once again - I include the link to how one woman cured her body of third stage breast cancer by her DIET - not a bunch of PINK T-SHIRTS AND RIBBONS.
2007 was a big year for Kim Tinkham - in February she was diagnosed with stage three breast cancer, in March she appeared on Oprah to discuss her decision to treat cancer by alternative means and in November she found out the cancer was gone...
Read more...
For Kim’s story in her own words, a list of books, movies and resources she used during her journey, as well as an excerpt from her book, “Cancer Angel,” visit www.cancerangel.com
Hat tip to Deb for this item:
Daily Dose with William Campbell Douglass II, M.D.
WC Douglass, M.D. [ mailto:realhealth@healthiernews.com]Monday, October 25, 2010 7:16 AM
Daily Dose - The pink-ribbon campaign's dirty little secret
The pink-ribbon campaign's dirty little secret
Here's what October smells like: burning leaves, pumpkin pie and BS.
That's because it's Breast Cancer Awareness Month, which is practically a national holiday at this point -- and if you don't join the "in" crowd and slap a pink ribbon on whatever you're wearing, you're treated like some kind of cold-blooded breast-hating monster.
But those pink ribbons don't exist to cure disease or save lives -- they represent a Big Pharma-funded effort to drive millions of women through a funnel of screenings for a disease many don't even have, and treatments that most of them don't even need.
In fact, the supposed benefits of all those screenings and treatments are about as real as the Great Pumpkin -- and the numbers prove it every time.
Breast Cancer Awareness Month is now 26 years old. In the 26 years since it was launched by AstraZeneca to help sell the company's cancer drugs, it's been a wild success -- for AstraZeneca and anyone else who makes money off cancer screenings and treatments.
But when it comes to saving lives and curing disease, it's been a miserable failure. Up to 15 lives are ruined with unnecessary and deforming breast-chopping surgeries and poisonous radiation treatments for every life "saved."
And even then, there's no guarantee that the one life "saved" was actually the result of early detection and brutal mainstream treatments -- because plenty of them were actually CAUSED by the radioactive and tumor-bursting screenings in the first place.
There's something you won't hear anywhere else this month!
The LA Times -- and kudos to them for this -- recently asked AstraZeneca if maybe Breast Cancer Awareness Month wasn't all it cracked up to be.
"If it's not broken, I don't think we should try and fix it," was all a spokesman could say.
Why mess with success, right?
But the Times didn't stray too far from the mainstream message -- because the very same day, the paper ran a massive 1,400-word article urging women with no sign of the disease to take AstraZeneca's cancer meds strictly as a preventive measure.
I'm taking those kudos back.
Another alternative is: Sanoviv Medical Center, a holistic treatment center
Mainstream pushes radiation tests
Whatever you do, don't get your health advice from the Los Angeles Times.
Hot on the heels of a report urging healthy women to take breast cancer meds even if they have no signs of the disease, the newspaper issued another stunner -- urging people to go out and get their X-rays.
The logic? Nearly everything has a radiation level anyway... so what's a little more?
The first example in the article is a banana -- which, because of its potassium content is slightly radioactive.
Not mentioned: You'd have to eat 600 bananas in one sitting to get a blast of radiation equal to a single chest X-ray... and 240,000 bananas to match an abdominal CT scan.
King Kong doesn't eat that many bananas!
What's more, the article tries to cloud the issue by mentioning everything from gamma rays to Hiroshima while making the ludicrous claim that, "it's impossible to know the real toll from CT scans and X-rays."
But it's not impossible.
In fact, there's some pretty clear research on this -- just don't expect to read about it in the Los Angeles Times. Where you can expect to read it is in The Douglass Report. I wrote an in-depth article on the dangers of CT scans earlier this year.
Studies have found that one percent of all new cancers are caused by CT scans alone. In fact, mainstream researchers have estimated that CT scans performed just in 2007 -- just that one single year -- will eventually lead to 29,000 cancers.
What does the Times have to say about this? Only that CT scans can cause cancer "in rare cases."
Does 29,000 in one year sound rare to you?
No matter how you look at it, radiation-based tests come with major risks -- and studies have found that half of them are completely unnecessary, and many more are wildly redundant.
I won't say never, ever get an X-ray or CT scan -- but before you put yourself into a lead-lined tube, make sure it's really necessary first.
You might be surprised at how often it's not.
Using my X-ray vision,
William Campbell Douglass II, M.D.
P.S. If you want to save your life, skip the test. It's as simple as that. To learn more about the dangers of CT scans, read the February 2010 issue of The Douglass Report. Not a subscriber? Click here to get instant access to this life-saving information.
To start receiving your own copy of the Daily Dose, visit:
http://clicks.douglassreport.com//t/AQ/AALsQw/AAL1vQ/C+U/AQ/AaJ5Qw/5KmN Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can sign-up to receive their own copy of the Daily Dose.
Copyright (c) 2010 by Healthier News, LLC. The Daily Dose may not be posted on commercial sites without written permission.
If you haven’t read it, get a copy of Knockout - based Suzanne Somers personal experience of beating cancer holistically
No comments:
Post a Comment