Showing posts with label trans fats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trans fats. Show all posts

Thursday, March 5, 2015

New WHO guidelines advise lowering sugar intake

By Sally Robertson, BSc  -  Medical News

New World Health Organization guidelines recommend that people reduce their daily free sugar intake to less than 10% of their total calorie intake, with a reduction to 5% representing a further target.

“Making policy changes to support this will be key if countries are to live up to their commitments to reduce the burden of noncommunicable diseases,” says Dr Francesco Branca, Director of WHO’s Department of Nutrition for Health and Development.

Gayvoronskaya_Yana / Shutterstock.com

Free sugars are the monosaccharides and disaccharides added to food and drink by manufacturers, cooks or consumers, as well as the sugars that occur naturally in fruit juice or honey, for example. The WHO guideline does not refer to the sugars found in fresh fruit and vegetables or milk, as no evidence exists to suggest that those sugars adversely affect our health.

Alison Tedstone, Director of the Diet and Obesity team, Public Health England, says surveys show that the average current daily free sugar intake among adults in the UK accounts for 11.6% of the total calorie intake, while among children it accounts for 15.2%.

The recommendation of less than 10% is based on a review of scientific evidence showing that a lower sugar intake among adults is associated with lower body weight and, among children, it is associated with a reduced likelihood of overweight and obesity. Furthermore, the evidence supports that an intake higher than 10% is associated with increased rates of tooth decay.

Dr Branca says:

We have solid evidence that keeping intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake reduces the risk of overweight, obesity and tooth decay

The quality of the evidence reviewed means that WHO can rank the recommendation as “strong” and therefore suitable for implementation as policy in most situations. The plans will now be subjected to public consultation, with firm recommendations expected to be put in place this summer and translated into food-based dietary guidelines and public health interventions to reduce sugar intake. Examples of such interventions include a reduction in the marketing of sugary food to children and the introduction of nutrition labeling for food products.

However, due to obesity rates rising worldwide, many experts believe that a goal of less than 10% is still too high and campaign group “Action for Sugar” is pressing for 5% to become the new target. Although the WHO now acknowledge that further health benefits can be achieved if the 5% goal is implemented, only three nationwide studies have demonstrated those health benefits. The WHO can therefore only make a “conditional” rather than “strong” recommendation for issuing this 5% goal for implementation.

A conditional recommendation refers to one that would probably be beneficial if adhered to but where the associated trade-offs between the desirable and undesirable effects still need to be clarified before the recommendation can be adopted as policy.

UK campaigners say it is a "tragedy" that it has taken 10 years for the WHO to think about changing its advice on sugar intake.

“We should aim for 5% if we can,” says Branca.

The update to the WHO guideline is part of the organization’s efforts to improve current dietary guidelines about preventing non-communicable diseases such as diabetes. The guidelines on sugar intake should be used in combination with other nutrition recommendations and goals, particularly those related to the intake of fats and fatty acids such as trans-fat and saturated fat.

Sources:

Related:

Monday, October 5, 2009

Margarine Linked to Lower IQs in Kids

Margarine is touted as a healthful alternative to butter, but it may be dumbing down our kids, according to researchers in New Zealand.

Children who ate margarine every day scored 3 points lower on IQ tests at the age of 3 than children who did not, said the researchers at Auckland University in New Zealand.

(Photo: In the early days of margarine, the consumer would receive the while substance resembling lard with a yellow food coloring pill to knead into it before serving, making it more eye appealing and therefore more appetizing.)

By the age of 7, children who were underweight at birth had scores that were up to 6 points lower than those of children who did not eat margarine on a daily basis.

A difference of even 3 points in a child’s IQ easily could make a difference between being classified as “mentally retarded,” which is an IQ score of 70-79 on some charts, instead of “dull normal,” a score of 80 to 90.

“The impact of regular margarine consumption on intelligence now warrants further investigation in order to replicate these findings and to identify possible mechanisms that may underlie this association,” the researchers said.

What lies behind the link? The researchers are not sure — even when socioeconomic factors such as the occupations of the parents were considered, the link still held. They speculate, however, that trans fats may be the culprit.

Trans fats are formed when vegetable oil is solidified, as in the case of margarine, and they raise “bad” cholesterol and lower “good” cholesterol. They have been associated with memory problems in tests with animals, and they make it more difficult to process healthier fats.

Both genuine butter and margarine should be used sparingly because of their high fat content.

Margarine vs. Butter Fact: Margarine consumption in the United States overtook butter in the 1950s

Margarine is touted as a healthful alternative to butter, but it may be dumbing down our kids, according to researchers in New Zealand.

Children who ate margarine every day scored 3 points lower on IQ tests at the age of 3 than children who did not, said the researchers at Auckland University in New Zealand.

By the age of 7, children who were underweight at birth had scores that were up to 6 points lower than those of children who did not eat margarine on a daily basis.

A difference of even 3 points in a child’s IQ easily could make a difference between being classified as “mentally retarded,” which is an IQ score of 70-79 on some charts, instead of “dull normal,” a score of 80 to 90.

“The impact of regular margarine consumption on intelligence now warrants further investigation in order to replicate these findings and to identify possible mechanisms that may underlie this association,” the researchers said.

What lies behind the link? The researchers are not sure — even when socioeconomic factors such as the occupations of the parents were considered, the link still held. They speculate, however, that trans fats may be the culprit.

Trans fats are formed when vegetable oil is solidified, as in the case of margarine, and they raise “bad” cholesterol and lower “good” cholesterol. They have been associated with memory problems in tests with animals, and they make it more difficult to process healthier fats.

Both genuine butter and margarine should be used sparingly because of their high fat content.

Margarine vs. Butter Fact: Margarine consumption in the United States overtook butter in the 1950s

Source: NewsMax Health

Posted: True Health Is True Wealth

There are many things that have contributed to the dumbing down of America’s children over the past 30 to 40 years… this is just one!

Related Resources:

The Dumbing Down of America Part 1

The Dumbing Down of America Part 11

The Dumbing Down of America Part III

The Dumbing Down of America IV

Monday, July 13, 2009

12 Food Additives to Remove From Your Diet

food additivesMany food additives have been studied and linked to various diseases. Becoming informed about the additives in everyday food items can make for an easier shopping experience and healthier food for everyone.

Here’s a list of some of the most medically questionable and harmful additives in everyday foods:

  1. Sodium nitrite
  2. BHA & BHT
  3. Propyl gallate
  4. Monosodium glutamate
  5. Trans fats
  6. Aspartame
  7. Acesulfame-K
  8. Food colorings (Blue, Red, Green, Yellow)
  9. Olestra
  10. Potassium bromate
  11. White sugar
  12. Sodium chloride (salt)

Since some of these may not be familiar to you, sodium nitrite is a preservative added most commonly to bacon, ham, hot dogs, sandwich meats, and smoked fish. BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) and BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) are other preservatives added to foods like cereal, gum, potato chips, and vegetable oils. Propyl gallate is found in meats, chicken soup base, and gum. All of these preservatives have been linked to cancer.

Monosodium glutamate (MSG) can cause migraines and other adverse effects. Trans fats are being eliminated from most foods, as the studies linking them to heart disease, strokes, and kidney problems are widely accepted.

Aspartame is an artificial sweetener found in products like NutraSweet and Equal as well as diet foods and soft drinks. And acesulfame-K is a newer sweetener used in soft drinks and some baked goods.

Many food colorings have been banned by the FDA, but some can still be found in foods that require a particular color. Olestra was common for a time in potato chips as an additive that prevented fat from being absorbed in your digestive system. Food colorings have been tied to cancer and Olestra also blocks vitamins from being processed.

Potassium bromate is sometimes added to white flour, breads, and rolls to increase the volume of the products, but it has cancer-causing properties that have prompted some states in America to actually require a label to that effect.

Finally, white sugar and sodium chloride (salt) can be dangerous if not kept to a minimum

Posted:  True Health Is True Wealth